Calibration of rain gauge and thermohygrometers in automated weather stations

  • Alberto Chassaigne Fundación para la Investigación Agrícola (Danac), San Felipe, estado Yaracuy. Venezuela.
  • Manuel Avila Fundación para la Investigación Agrícola (Danac), San Felipe, estado Yaracuy. Venezuela.
  • Jesús Madriz Fundación para la Investigación Agrícola (Danac), San Felipe, estado Yaracuy. Venezuela.
Keywords: metrology, weather instruments, wireless

Abstract

In Venezuela, farms and research institutes have incorporated Automatic Weather Stations (EMA, acronym in Spanish) in their systems, which require calibration periodically to ensure the reliability of results. The aim of this work was to verify the calibration of a rain gauge PCR800  (Brand Oregon)  and three Thermo hygrometers WMR200A (Brand Oregon) before installation.  Static and dynamic tests were applied in the rain gauge. The Thermo hygrometers THGN801 were calibrated by adjusting the temperature in the oven and the results were compared with a calibrated Thermo hygrometer.  The rain gauge static test indicated that the differences between the added water and water recorded for all levels were not significant (P<0.025); while the dynamic test indicated a maximum difference of 3 mm between wireless rain gauge and conventional one, used as a reference.  Thermo hygrometers differences in temperature and relative humidity with respect to standard did not exceed tolerances of the equipment and showed no significant variations (P<0.025).  It was verified that the calibration of the gauge and the Thermo hygrometers were conformed to the tolerances stated by manufacturers for a wide range of levels of precipitation, temperature, and relative humidity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Agencia Venezolana de Noticias (AVN). 2013. Durante 2012 INAMEH instaló 49 estaciones hidrometeorológicas en 18 estados. Disponible en línea: https://bit.ly/2WiWcyy [Ene. 23, 2013].

• Azkue M. de, A. Cortez e I. Oliveros. 2004. Conozca la Red de estaciones agroclimáticas del INIA, Venezuela. CENIAP HOY N° 4, enero-abril 2004. Maracay, Aragua. Disponible en línea: https://bit.ly/33nPSHy [Oct. 15, 2012].

• Cabrera S. 2000. Agronomía del Cultivo: Épocas de siembra y densidades óptimas en maíz. In: Fontana, H. y González, C. (Comps.) El maíz en Venezuela. Fundación Polar (Ed). Caracas. Venezuela. 530 p.

• Campbell Scientific. 2010. Guía del usuario ARG100 Tipping Bucket Raingauge, pag. 6. Disponible en línea: https://bit.ly/39ZTNga [Sep.15, 2012].

• Franco A. 2006. Descripción de sensores y componentes asociados a una estación meteorológica automática en Maldonado, I, Aravena, R. (Eds) Redes de Estaciones meteorológicas Automáticas y sus aplicaciones productivas. Boletín INIA N° 145. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias Chile. pp. 61-80.

• Miles S.R. 1963. Handbook of tolerances and of measures of precision for seed testing. Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association 28(3):525-686.

• Monasterio P., F. Pierre, T. Barreto, G. Alejos, W. Maturet y J. Tablante. 2008. El pluviómetro artesanal: una manera práctica de medir la precipitación. INIA Divulga 11:45-48.

• Oregon Scientific. 2009. Manual del usuario Centro meteorológico profesional modelo WMR200A. Disponible en línea: https://bit.ly/2IQ9DhJ [ Abr.12,2012].

• Rodríguez P. 2000. Aspectos climatológicos relacionados con la producción comercial de maíz. In: Fontana, H. y González, C. (Comps.) El maíz en Venezuela. Fundación Polar (Ed). Caracas. Venezuela. 530 p.
Published
2013-12-30
How to Cite
Chassaigne, A., Avila, M., & Madriz, J. (2013). Calibration of rain gauge and thermohygrometers in automated weather stations. Agronomía Tropical, 63(3-4), 185-192. Retrieved from http://publicaciones.inia.gob.ve/index.php/agronomiatropical/article/view/249
Section
Technical note